A Project of the Hudson Institute New York and the Touro College Institute for Human Rights   July 30, 2010
What's New
  Latest
Get email updates
Features
  Durban Watch
  Non-UN Country Reports on Human Rights Conditions
  UN Human Rights Council
  UN Map with no Israel
  UN Officials & Iran
  UN Palestinian Solidarity Day 2007
  UN Palestinian Solidarity Day 2006
  Video Updates
Fact Check
  Straight UN Facts
Group Politics
UN-Style
UN Member States
Democratic Multilateral Alternatives
Memorable UN Moments
  Durban film
Durban photos
  Purpose
Who We Are
Contact

Disclaimer
 

Editor's Notes


   Print   
The End of the 2006 UN General Assembly: Annan's Legacy, Moon's Millstone, Anne Bayefsky

Kofi Annan had a pet peeve – Israel. If only Israel would do this or that, terrorism would end, peace would come to the Middle East, harmony would reverberate around the world, and the reasons for hating the rest of us would wither away. It was, and is, a lie that has served the world's worst human rights violators well, allowing them to escape scrutiny since the UN is otherwise occupied.

It therefore comes as no surprise to learn of the tally of condemnations coming from the General Assembly during the fall of 2006:
  • Resolutions condemning Israel for human rights violations: 25
  • Number of anti-Israel resolutions which are new this year: 4 (from the regular session) + 2 (from emergency sessions)
  • Resolutions condemning human rights violations in any other state: 4 from the General Assembly's Third or main human rights committee directed at Myanmar/Burma, Democratic Republic of Korea, Iran, Belarus
How about Sudan? Nothing. Syria? Zip. China? Nope. Saudi Arabia? Zilch. And so on.
  • Number of 61st General Assembly resolutions mentioning, let alone condemning, human rights violations by Hamas, Hezbollah and Islamic Jihad: you guessed it – zero.

[ CONTINUED ... ]

In case you're wondering what the new year and the new Secretary-General Ban Ki Moon might bring, here is what he told the New York Sun this week:

    Mr. Ban said the Middle East "by far" raises "the most important, or sensitive and complex, issues which the international community has not been able to resolve for the last six decades," adding that at the "core" of the dispute is the "Israeli-Palestinian relations."

In the blink of an eye, the new Secretary-General has in effect decided that if only Israel would do this or that, Middle East peace would be upon us -- ignoring the history of rejectionism of a Jewish state, the terrorist legacy of those rejectionists, and their racist motivations. These war-mongers have one thing in common – a hate for democracy, freedom and equality.

An inauspicious start for a new Moon.


Posted:  Friday, December 29, 2006
 

Archive


September 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
February 2008
December 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005



Copyright 2005, EYEontheUN.org. All rights reserved.   |   To receive weekly newsletter click here.